Claims

The analyses yielded a framework for finding students' FoK and for categorising FoK/I-related teaching practices along two dimensions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Analysis of the action research data produced a framework suggesting ways to find students' FoK. → J. 't Gilde 2021 q2 i? The framework categorises FoK/I-related teaching practices along two dimensions: individual students' resources vs. collective resources, and scope of the teaching activities. → J. 't Gilde 2021

Evidence

J. 't Gilde 2021

J. 't Gilde, M. Volman. (2021). Finding and using students’ funds of knowledge and identity in superdiverse primary schools: a collaborative action research project. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(6), 673-692. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1906845

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Qualitative analysis of logbook, interview and focus group data from the collaborative action research project produced the framework. The article states the analyses "categorises FoK/I-related teaching practices along two dimensions". No effect size is printed.

"The analyses result in a framework that suggests ways to find students’ FoK, and that categorises FoK/I-related teaching practices along two dimensions: (1) individual students’ resources vs. collective resources; and (2) scope of the teaching activities."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fok-teaching-practices-framework-two-dimensions
title The analyses yielded a framework for finding students' FoK and for categorising FoK/I-related teaching practices along two dimensions
description The analyses yielded a framework for finding students' FoK and for categorising FoK/I-related teaching practices along two dimensions
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — j-t-gilde-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.