Formative evaluation was associated with increased interest, confidence and study time among adult ESL students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After the experiment, 31 of 40 experimental students reported interest in learning English and 25 reported confidence, up from 6 and 4 respectively before the experiment. → Yi 2012
Evidence¶
Yi 2012¶
Qin Yi. (2012). Empirical Study of Formative Evaluation in Adult ESL Teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p27
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pre/post Questionnaire 2 administered only to the 40 experimental-class students; Table 1 shows interest rising from 6 to 31 students and confidence from 4 to 25. The author states "the st udents’ attitude change greatly".
"While after the experiment the st udents’ attitude change greatly. Among the 40 students 31 students become interested in learning the language and 25 students build up confidence in the English language learning."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Formative evaluation raised adult ESL learners' achievement scores over one semester while traditional teaching produced no noticeable change — related
- Applying formative evaluation strengthened the teacher's beliefs that every student can learn and boosted students' self-confidence — related
- Interviewed experimental students overwhelmingly reported liking formative evaluation and improved learning, and no longer feared tests — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.