Claims

Formative evaluation raised adult ESL learners' achievement scores over one semester while traditional teaching produced no noticeable change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental class's mean score increased by 11.42 points (76.38 to 87.80) after a semester of formative evaluation, while the controlled class showed no noticeable change (82.10 to 82.28). → Yi 2012

Evidence

Yi 2012

Qin Yi. (2012). Empirical Study of Formative Evaluation in Adult ESL Teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p27

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 40 experimental and 40 controlled adult students taught by the same teacher for the same weekly time; pretest and posttest compared the two classes. The experimental mean rose from 76.38 to 87.80, "an increase of 11.42 from its previous 76.38".

"After the experiment, there is no noticeable change of mean score for the controlled class subjected to the traditional teaching method while that for the experimental class has reached 87.80, an increase of 11.42 from its previous 76.38."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.