Claims

Inductive analysis identified a new 'focal' characteristic of MR with four focals: clinical, ethical, epistemological and ontological

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Data not fitting pre-established codes revealed that MR is performed through an analysis grid; four focals were identified, with the clinical focal (relevance/effectiveness for the specific case) the most prevalent. → Perdrix Yannick 2026

Evidence

Perdrix Yannick 2026

Perdrix Yannick, Nael Jérémy, Dionne Eric, Pinsault Nicolas. (2026). Metacognitive regulation in physical therapists’ clinical reasoning: a scoping review. International Journal of Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563282/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Inductive interpretive phase of the qualitative synthesis created the focal theme from data coded as 'other'. The article reports "This was the most prevalent focal" for the clinical focal, with ethical, epistemological and ontological focals each anchored to cited articles.

"We created a new key characteristic, named focal, that defined the analysis grid with which metacognitive regulation is achieved. Four focals were identified. The clinical focal concerns the relevance or effectiveness of reasoning for the specific clinical case."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.