Inductive analysis identified a new 'focal' characteristic of MR with four focals: clinical, ethical, epistemological and ontological¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Data not fitting pre-established codes revealed that MR is performed through an analysis grid; four focals were identified, with the clinical focal (relevance/effectiveness for the specific case) the most prevalent. → Perdrix Yannick 2026
Evidence¶
Perdrix Yannick 2026¶
Perdrix Yannick, Nael Jérémy, Dionne Eric, Pinsault Nicolas. (2026). Metacognitive regulation in physical therapists’ clinical reasoning: a scoping review. International Journal of Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563282/
q3 · i? · review · r2
Inductive interpretive phase of the qualitative synthesis created the focal theme from data coded as 'other'. The article reports "This was the most prevalent focal" for the clinical focal, with ethical, epistemological and ontological focals each anchored to cited articles.
"We created a new key characteristic, named focal, that defined the analysis grid with which metacognitive regulation is achieved. Four focals were identified. The clinical focal concerns the relevance or effectiveness of reasoning for the specific clinical case."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Assessment of metacognitive regulation appears underexploited in physical therapy, with existing methods not adequately capturing tasks-focals interplay or interaction dynamics — related
- MR timing codes fit the literature except pre-task timing (underrepresented at 14%), and tasks are dominated by global management (60%) and cognitive (44%) — related
- Metacognitive regulation in PT clinical reasoning fits Johnson's three types (self-observation, self-judgment, self-reaction), with all types represented in 58–75% of included articles — related
- A scoping review following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines identified 1,025 documents and analyzed 36 on metacognitive regulation in physical therapy clinical reasoning — related
- Metacognitive regulation in PT clinical reasoning is relational and often co-constructed in interaction with the self, patient, family, professionals and peers — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.