Claims

Metacognitive regulation in PT clinical reasoning fits Johnson's three types (self-observation, self-judgment, self-reaction), with all types represented in 58–75% of included articles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The three types of metacognitive activity — self-observation, self-judgment and self-reaction — fitted the PT clinical reasoning data, and each type was well represented (from 58 to 75%). → Perdrix Yannick 2026

Evidence

Perdrix Yannick 2026

Perdrix Yannick, Nael Jérémy, Dionne Eric, Pinsault Nicolas. (2026). Metacognitive regulation in physical therapists’ clinical reasoning: a scoping review. International Journal of Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563282/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Qualitative synthesis across the 36 included articles. The review reports that "The different types of MR were well represented (from 58 to 75%)" across the corpus, supporting the transfer of Johnson's taxonomy to PT clinical reasoning.

"The results fitted with Johnson’s17 three types of metacognitive activity: Self-observation 18,21–26(i.e. recognising one’s own thoughts, emotions, or actions), Self-judgment"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.