MR timing codes fit the literature except pre-task timing (underrepresented at 14%), and tasks are dominated by global management (60%) and cognitive (44%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? All timings were fairly well represented (between 53 and 72%) except pre-task timing (14%), and tasks ranked: global management 60%, cognitive 44%, psychomotor 33%, emotional 28%, communicational 11%. → Perdrix Yannick 2026
Evidence¶
Perdrix Yannick 2026¶
Perdrix Yannick, Nael Jérémy, Dionne Eric, Pinsault Nicolas. (2026). Metacognitive regulation in physical therapists’ clinical reasoning: a scoping review. International Journal of Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563282/
q3 · i? · review · r2
Descriptive frequency analysis of coded data from the 36 included articles. The article prints the percentages for each timing and task category, noting MR is well represented for type, timing and task except pre-task timing and the communicational task.
"All timings were also fairly well represented (between 53 and 72%) in the literature except for the pre-timing, which was underrepresented (14%). The tasks were mainly on global management (60%) and cognitive (44%), then psychomotor (33%) and emotional (28%) and least communicational (11%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Inductive analysis identified a new 'focal' characteristic of MR with four focals: clinical, ethical, epistemological and ontological — related
- Metacognitive regulation in PT clinical reasoning fits Johnson's three types (self-observation, self-judgment, self-reaction), with all types represented in 58–75% of included articles — related
- Metacognitive regulation in PT clinical reasoning is relational and often co-constructed in interaction with the self, patient, family, professionals and peers — related
- Script-supported groups mainly engaged in accepted intra-group metacognitive interaction, with co-constructed interaction infrequent and highly variable between groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.