The framework's recommendations were derived from a research and practices review plus 59 expert interviews¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The framework draws on a comprehensive review of research and recommended practices including 59 expert interviews. → ev-derivation
Evidence¶
Pattenhouse 2025¶
Pattenhouse, M., Noakes, S., Mills, K., Shell, A., & Vollavanh, A. (2025, November). Framework for Powerful Learning with Emerging Technology. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/275
q2 · i? · review · r?
The report describes its own development method: a review of research and recommended practices combined with 59 expert interviews, used to articulate "practical design recommendations" for emerging-technology-enabled learning products. No further methodological detail is printed.
"Our Framework for Powerful Learning with Emerging Technology, drawing from a comprehensive review of research and recommended practices including 59 expert interviews, articulates practical design recommendations"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Expert review and stakeholder consultation established strong consensus on the need for and acceptability of the Framework — related
- A WWC expert panel distilled recent research into seven recommendations for preschool educators on preparing young children for school — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
framework-derived-review-59-expert-interviews |
title |
The framework's recommendations were derived from a research and practices review plus 59 expert interviews |
description |
The framework's recommendations were derived from a research and practices review plus 59 expert interviews |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pattenhouse-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.