In the frontal-instruction control lesson, teacher attention concentrated on the student at the blackboard and most students remained passive¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? During blackboard solving, the teacher paid attention only to the student at the blackboard; half the students solved independently and only a few paid attention to the teacher. → Klubal et al. 2017

Evidence¶

Klubal et al. 2017¶

Libor Klubal, Katerina Kostolanyova and Vojtěch Gybas. (2017). Using Tablet and iTunesU as Individualized Instruction Tools. 13th International Conference Mobile Learning 2017. ISBN: 978-989-8533-61-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579278

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Observational account of the control group's frontal lesson with 26 students. The researcher recorded that "the teacher paid attention only to the student at the blackboard" and that only a few students followed the discussion.

"The students solved the individual problems on the blackboard while discussing it with the teacher. Therefore, the teacher paid attention only to the student at the blackboard. Half of the students solved the problems by themselves and then compared their result with the result on the blackboard. Only few of the students paid attention to the teacher."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a 45-minute equations lesson, students in the tablet-and-iTunesU individualized group solved more problems than students in the frontal-instruction control group — related
• Lesson observations confirmed that control school teaching was didactic and teacher-centred, with minimal learner interaction — related
• Students in the individualized tablet lesson progressed far enough to reach a competitive game activity that the frontal-instruction control group could not reach due to time constraints — related