Students in the individualized tablet lesson progressed far enough to reach a competitive game activity that the frontal-instruction control group could not reach due to time constraints¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? By 39 minutes, all 27 experimental-group students were playing the mathematics game, whereas the control group's second activity ran past 42 minutes and the teacher decided not to proceed to the following activity. → Klubal et al. 2017
Evidence¶
Klubal et al. 2017¶
Libor Klubal, Katerina Kostolanyova and Vojtěch Gybas. (2017). Using Tablet and iTunesU as Individualized Instruction Tools. 13th International Conference Mobile Learning 2017. ISBN: 978-989-8533-61-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579278
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Observational account of the experimental lesson by a teacher and a non-involved researcher. Students worked at their own pace through three activities; by 39 minutes "all of the students were playing the mathematical game".
"With 39 minutes having elapsed, all of the students were playing the mathematical game."
Klubal et al. 2017 (2)¶
Libor Klubal, Katerina Kostolanyova and Vojtěch Gybas. (2017). Using Tablet and iTunesU as Individualized Instruction Tools. 13th International Conference Mobile Learning 2017. ISBN: 978-989-8533-61-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579278
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Observational account of the parallel frontal lesson. The worksheet task ran to 42 minutes, and with "only 3 minutes left" the teacher skipped the following activity; the game was only handed out at the end.
"The first students finished the tasks 42 minutes into the class. As there were only 3 minutes left, the teacher decided not to proceed to the following activity."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In a 45-minute equations lesson, students in the tablet-and-iTunesU individualized group solved more problems than students in the frontal-instruction control group — related
- In the frontal-instruction control lesson, teacher attention concentrated on the student at the blackboard and most students remained passive — related
- The experimental group answered achievement tests faster (6.18 minutes) than the control group (7.51 minutes) — related
- The teacher and researcher judged the individualized tablet-group students more motivated than the control group, but report this as a subjective opinion — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.