Claims

In a 45-minute equations lesson, students in the tablet-and-iTunesU individualized group solved more problems than students in the frontal-instruction control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 70.37% of the experimental group solved 11 problems versus 23.08% of the control group, while 38.46% of the control group solved only 7-8. → Klubal et al. 2017

Evidence

Klubal et al. 2017

Libor Klubal, Katerina Kostolanyova and Vojtěch Gybas. (2017). Using Tablet and iTunesU as Individualized Instruction Tools. 13th International Conference Mobile Learning 2017. ISBN: 978-989-8533-61-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579278

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Comparison of two parallel 45-minute lessons: an experimental group of 27 12-13-year-olds working individually with tablets and iTunesU, and a control group of 26 taught frontally. Table 1 reports "11 19 70.37 % 6 23.08 %" for problems solved.

"Table 1. Comparing the number of solved problems in groups. Number of solved problems Experimental Group Control Group Number Share of total Number Share of total 11 19 70.37 % 6 23.08 %"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.