Claims

Full-immersion EMI students show no statistically significant gains in any measured language domain over one year, despite descriptive improvement trends

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The immersion group (N=7) showed no statistically significant gains on listening, grammar, cloze, fluency, accuracy, or complexity measures between T1 and T2. → Ament 2015

Evidence

Ament 2015

Ament, J. R., & Pérez Vidal, C. (2015). Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests on the immersion group (N=7) across one academic year found all p-values above .05 for listening, grammar, cloze, and all CAF writing measures; the article states "the IM group shows no significant gains in any of the language domains measured."

"The results for the first three tasks, listening grammar, and cloze, all reflect values where p=>.05 (Table 6). The CAF measures also reflect values where p= >.05, for all tasks."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.