Claims

A 2-day foot ulcer simulation training workshop increased podiatrists' confidence and significantly improved their theoretical knowledge and practical skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A before–after evaluation of a 2-day practical simulation training workshop (FUST) found significant improvements in podiatrists' theoretical knowledge and practical skills and increased confidence in managing foot ulcers. → Anning Naomi 2024

Evidence

Anning Naomi 2024

Anning Naomi, Tehan Peta. (2024). Simulation in podiatry teaching and learning: A scoping review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70020

q2 · i? · review · r3

Before–after quasi-experimental study (Lazzarini et al., as charted in Table 1) of a 2-day workshop using part-task stations, scenario-based simulations with foot models, and standardized patients with simulated foot ulcers. The review reports significant improvements in knowledge and practical skills; no effect size is printed.

"FUST program was effective in increasing podiatrists' confidence in managing foot ulcers, with significant improvements observed in both theoretical knowledge and practical skills as assessed through simulation‐based training"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.