Post-test achievement of gadget-taught experimental groups did not differ significantly between the aided and the government school¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? There was no significant difference between the experimental groups' post-test scores in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School and Gopala Samudram Middle School. → Singaravelu 2014

Evidence¶

Singaravelu 2014¶

Singaravelu, G. (2014). Impact of Gadget Based Learning of Grammar in English at Standard II. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 4, No. 2, April-June. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068432

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Finding 7 compares the two schools' gadget-taught experimental groups (post-test means 19.65 and 19.86) and reports no significant difference, suggesting similar effectiveness across the aided and government school settings.

"There is no significant difference in the achieved mean score between the students of standard of II in post test of Experimental group from Shri Vani Vilas Middle school, and post test of Experimental group from Gopala samudram Middle school"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Gadget Based Learning is more effective than conventional method in learning English grammar at standard II in both an aided and a government school — related
• Experimental groups showed significant pre-to-post gains in English grammar achievement after gadget-based learning in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School — related
• Experimental groups showed significant pre-to-post gains in English grammar achievement after gadget-based learning in Gopala Samudram Middle School — related