GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves knowledge examination scores in medical students compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 0.95)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Pooled across 57 studies, GAI-assisted teaching significantly improved knowledge examination scores versus control (SMD = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.72–1.18). → Ma Xingming 2026
Evidence¶
Ma Xingming 2026¶
Ma Xingming, Liu Xianting, Sun Haojie. (2026). The effectiveness of GAI-assisted teaching methods in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1813108
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3
Random-effects meta-analysis of 57 studies (2,902 control, 2,723 GAI-assisted participants) reported in the knowledge examination scores section. The pooled effect showed "a significant improvement in knowledge scores in the GAI-assisted teaching group" with high heterogeneity (I2 = 94%).
"Compared with the control group, the pooled effect of the studies (SMD = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.72-1.18, p < 0.00001) showed a significant improvement in knowledge scores in the GAI-assisted teaching group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves analytical and problem-solving skills compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.53; OR = 10.28) — related
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves clinical thinking ability compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.18; OR = 10.97) — related
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves practical examination scores in medical students compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.48) — related
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves learning self-efficacy compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 0.75) — related
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves learning initiative compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.20; OR = 9.44) — related
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly improves self-directed learning ability compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.25; OR = 7.37) — related
- GAI-assisted teaching significantly increases student satisfaction with teaching compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.52; OR = 5.58) — related
- Virtual patients blended with traditional education improve knowledge more than traditional education alone (pooled SMD=0.73) — related
- Blended teaching shows no significant difference in multiple-choice question scores compared to traditional teaching — related
- Simulation teaching improves medical students' multiple-choice question scores compared to traditional teaching — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.