Claims

The effect of games on mathematics achievement does not differ significantly by implementation period

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-group homogeneity for implementation period was not significant (QB = 8.313, p = 0.216); the 6–10 hours subgroup showed the largest effect (1.010). → Sedat Turgut 2017

Evidence

Sedat Turgut 2017

Sedat Turgut, Özlem Dogan Temur. (2017). The Effect of Game-Assisted Mathematics Education on Academic Achievement in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017236115

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis across seven implementation-period groups (1–5 hours ES = 0.337 up to 6–10 hours ES = 1.010), with QB = 8.313 below the critical value of 12.592 at 95% significance.

"Accordingly, a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of implementation period is not found. Therefore, the academic achievement attained by using games in different implementation periods does not show a statistically significant differentiation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.