Male gender predicted lower grades, moderated by cohort¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Male gender was a significant negative predictor of grades (b = -0.26, p = .050), but its effect depended on cohort (interaction b = 0.10, p = .006). → Lopera-Oquendo 2024

Evidence¶

Lopera-Oquendo 2024¶

Lopera-Oquendo, C., Lipnevich, A. A., & Mañez, I. (2024). Rating writing: Comparison of holistic and analytic grading approaches in pre-service teachers. Learning and Instruction, 94, 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101992

q2 · i? · causal · r1

In the final HLM (N = 229, 916 observations), the male gender coefficient was negative and significant (b = -0.26, p = .050) with a significant gender-by-cohort interaction (b = 0.10, p = .006).

"Gender (Male = 1, Female = 0) was a statistically significant and negative predictor of grades (b = -0.26, p = .050). However, the main effect of gender on grades depended on the cohort (b = 0.10, p = .006)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause

Related Claims¶

• Gender related to students' emotions but showed no significant effects on math grades, while intelligence and SES related positively to grades — reports the opposite
• Female gender, higher autonomous motivation, lower prior knowledge, and higher final course grades each predict more frequent voluntary StatBot use among graduate statistics students — related
• Regulatory strategy use and classroom grades showed no subject-area differences, though females received higher grades than males — reports the opposite
• During the first pandemic wave, negative achievement emotions were more frequent than positive ones, moderated by gender and area of study — related