Claims

In Study 1, women reported more epistemic conflict regulation than men

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A gender effect on epistemic conflict regulation was observed, such that this mode was stronger for women than for men; gender did not predict relational regulation. → Darnon 2006

Evidence

Darnon 2006

Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and Performance Goals Predict Epistemic and Relational Conflict Regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.766

q3 · i? · associational · r1

In Study 1 preliminary analyses, "a gender effect on epistemic conflict regulation" emerged (B = 0.69, t(42) = 3.91, p < .001); the authors deemed it not theoretically relevant and removed gender from the final model.

"The only significant effect was a gender effect on epistemic conflict regulation ( B /H110050.69), t(42) /H110053.91, p /H11021.001, such that this mode of regulation was stronger for women than for men."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gender-difference-epistemic-conflict-regulation
title In Study 1, women reported more epistemic conflict regulation than men
description In Study 1, women reported more epistemic conflict regulation than men
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2006
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — darnon-2006

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.