Claims

Female students used the application more and learned more vocabulary, while male students scored higher on performance rating and posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Female weekly hourly usage (M = 3.39) was greater than male usage (M = 2.96), and females learned more new vocabulary (M = 1071.21) than males (M = 824.00). → Whitaker 2016 q2 i? Male students outperformed female students on overall performance rating (M = 2444.26 vs M = 2335.31) and on the posttest (M = 30.20 vs M = 27.36). → Whitaker 2016

Evidence

Whitaker 2016

Whitaker, J. T. (2016). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Computer Applications in Developing English Learning. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 12947-12958. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive gender comparison of usage and performance metrics from the application logs in the 30-day experimental period; females showed higher usage and vocabulary learned, while males outperformed females on overall performance rating and posttest scores as printed in the Results section.

"In terms of gender, female weekly hourly usage (M = 3.39, SD = 1.54, Min = 1.10, Max = 7.57) was greater than male usage (M = 2.96, SD = 1.37, Min = 1.25, Max = 6.34). Female students learned more new vocabulary (M = 1071.21, SD = 568.87, Min = 95, Max = 2502) than male students (M = 824.00, SD = 329.14, Min = 248, Max = 1402)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.