Claims

In the task-based ESP class, male learners significantly outperformed female learners on the technical vocabulary post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male learners (mean 25.80) scored significantly higher than female learners (mean 22.80) in the experimental group (t = -3.664, df = 21/23, p = .004/.001). → Abdullah Sarani & Leila Farzaneh Sahebi 2012

Evidence

Abdullah Sarani & Leila Farzaneh Sahebi 2012

Abdullah Sarani & Leila Farzaneh Sahebi. (2012). The Impact of Task-based Approach on Vocabulary Learning in ESP Courses. English Language Teaching, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p118

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Independent-sample t-test comparing post-test scores of the 10 male and 15 female students in the task-based experimental group. The article reports means of 25.80 (males) and 22.80 (females) and a significant difference; no effect size is printed.

"As Table 7 depicts, the t-value with its 21 degrees of freedom was -3.664. In fact the t-observed (-3.664) was more than t-critical (2.80), at 0.05 level of significance. Therefore, the significance of differences between male and female was proved. That means male learners outperformed female learners."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.