Claims

Gender × pre-achievement interaction favored males in the high achievement group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The interaction between gender and level of pre-achievement was significant, in favor of males in the high achievement group. → Ziad Mohammed Mahmoud Qabaja 2016

Evidence

Ziad Mohammed Mahmoud Qabaja 2016

Ziad Mohammed Mahmoud Qabaja, Jamal Subhi Ismail Nafi’, Maisa’ Issa Khalil Abu-Nimah. (2016). The Effect of Using the “SQP2RS via WTL” Strategy through Science Context to 10th Graders’ Reading Comprehension in English in Palestine. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1115849

q3 · i? · causal · r2

3-way ANCOVA interaction from the quasi-experiment; Table 9 adjusted means show male high achievement at 41.120 versus female high achievement at 38.203, in favor of the male in the high achievement group.

"F value for the interaction between the gende r and level of pre-achievement was (20.051), and the significant level was (0.000) and this is less than the ( α≤ 0.05), so there are significant differences for the interacti on between gender and level of pre-achievement"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.