Post-achievement differed significantly by gender in favor of males¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Males scored significantly higher than females on the post-achievement test, with eta squared of .043. → Khader 2016
Evidence¶
Khader 2016¶
Nisreen Saleh Khader Khader. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Improving Students' Achievement in Third Grade's Science in Bani Kenana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126508
q2 · i2 · causal · r1
Same two-way ANCOVA on post-achievement for the gender factor (27 males and 27 females per group). The article reports "the value of (P) was (4.628), which is statistically significant" with effect size .043 in favor of males.
"in favor of males;the value of (P) was (4.628), which is statistically significant at the level of statistical significance (α = 0.05)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- In a Neurological Impress Method study, boys with learning disabilities outscored girls on post-test reading fluency in both the NIM and control groups, and the study did not show that NIM's effect differed by gender — related
- Achievement differences favor females over males under both teaching conditions, with a small effect — reports the opposite
- Before the intervention, male students scored significantly higher than female students on the English grammar pre-test — related
- Within the brainstorming-taught experimental group, female students significantly outperformed male students on the English grammar post-test — related
- Male students taught algebraic expressions with games achieved significantly higher adjusted scores than female students — reports the opposite
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — related
- Gender significantly affects Electronic Works achievement, favouring boys — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.