Claims

Post-achievement differed significantly by gender in favor of males

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Males scored significantly higher than females on the post-achievement test, with eta squared of .043. → Khader 2016

Evidence

Khader 2016

Nisreen Saleh Khader Khader. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Improving Students' Achievement in Third Grade's Science in Bani Kenana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126508

q2 · i2 · causal · r1

Same two-way ANCOVA on post-achievement for the gender factor (27 males and 27 females per group). The article reports "the value of (P) was (4.628), which is statistically significant" with effect size .043 in favor of males.

"in favor of males;the value of (P) was (4.628), which is statistically significant at the level of statistical significance (α = 0.05)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.