Claims

No significant gender difference in academic performance among students exposed to the lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? T-calculated values (1.86 in School A; 0.45 in School B) were below the t-critical value of 2.064, so the null hypothesis of no male-female difference under lecture was accepted. → Muhammad 2016

Evidence

Muhammad 2016

Muhammad, A. U., Bala, D., & Ladu, K. M. (2016). Effectiveness of Demonstration and Lecture Methods in Learning Concept in Economics among Secondary School Students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099610

q2 · i? · causal · r1

T-tests comparing post-test scores of male and female students (13 each per school) taught with the lecture method showed no significant difference. The article attributes any observed difference to sampling errors.

"Thus, there were no statistically significant diffe rences between the academic performance of male and female student s exposed to lecture method in learning economics concepts in both schools."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.