Claims

No significant gender difference in transfer of knowledge in physics under guided discovery, demonstration or expository teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? t-tests found no significant effect of gender on transfer scores under guided discovery (t = 0.02), demonstration (t = 0.68) or expository (t = 0.15), each below the critical value of 1.98. → Akinbobola 2015

Evidence

Akinbobola 2015

Akinbobola, Akinyemi Olufunminiyi. (2015). Enhancing Transfer of Knowledge in Physics through Effective Teaching Strategies. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079935

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Three t-test comparisons of male versus female transfer scores (Tables 5-7) in the same 278-student quasi-experiment; the guided discovery comparison shown here gave t = 0.02 against a critical value of 1.98, and the demonstration and expository comparisons were likewise not significant.

"The analysis in Table 5 shows that the calculated t -value of 0.02 is less than the critical t-value of 1.98 at p<.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis stating a non-signif icant effect of gender (male and female) on student s' transfer of knowledge in physics taught with guided discover y was retained."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.