Claims

Gender differences appear in progression outcomes and workplace-based assessments, including ARCP outcomes, milestone ratings, feedback language and granted autonomy, with direction varying by specialty and rater

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two studies reported women received 60% more non-satisfactory ARCP outcomes than men, while in O&G men had higher non-satisfactory outcomes. → Jones Rebecca L. 2024 q2 i? In workplace-based assessment, men received compliments with superlatives while women more often received mitigating phrases, and assessors often gave female trainees lower autonomy ratings. → Jones Rebecca L. 2024 (2)

Evidence

Jones Rebecca L. 2024

Jones Rebecca L., Prusmetikul Suwimol, Whitehorn Sarah. (2024). Differential attainment in assessment of postgraduate surgical trainees: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05580-2

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing two cohort studies, that women received "60% more non-satisfactory outcomes than men" in ARCP progression reviews, while an RCOG report found the reverse in O&G. No effect sizes are printed.

"Two studies reported that women received 60% more non-satisfactory outcomes than men [16, 18]. In contrast, in O&G men had higher non-satisfactory ARCP outcomes without explicit reasons for this given [19]."

Jones Rebecca L. 2024 (2)

Jones Rebecca L., Prusmetikul Suwimol, Whitehorn Sarah. (2024). Differential attainment in assessment of postgraduate surgical trainees: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05580-2

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis of workplace-based assessment studies: narrative feedback differed by gender (superlatives vs. mitigating phrases), and several studies found assessors gave female trainees lower autonomy ratings, though only one replicated this in performance scores. Findings are second-hand via the review.

"Gerull et al. [25] demonstrated men received compliments with superlatives or standout words, whereas women were more likely to receive compliments with mitigating phrases (e.g., excellent vs. quite competent)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.