Claims

Evidence on gender gaps in surgical examination pass rates is mixed, with lower female MRCS pass rates in some UK studies but no differences in several other examinations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two UK studies reported significantly lower MRCS pass rates for female trainees, while other studies found no significant gender differences in ABSCE, FRCS, OITE/ABOS scores or MRCS. → Jones Rebecca L. 2024

Evidence

Jones Rebecca L. 2024

Jones Rebecca L., Prusmetikul Suwimol, Whitehorn Sarah. (2024). Differential attainment in assessment of postgraduate surgical trainees: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05580-2

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's synthesis of academic-achievement studies: two UK studies found lower MRCS pass rates for female trainees, but Robinson et al. found no significant gender differences in MRCS, and no significant disparities were reported for ABSCE, FRCS or OITE/ABOS scores. The review reports these as second-hand findings.

"In the UK, two studies reported significantly lower Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) pass rates for female trainees compared to males [4, 14]. However, Robinson et al. [15] presented no significant gender differences in MRCS success rates."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.