Claims

At the organizational level, general climate negatively moderates the positive effect of strategic climate on implementers' perceptions of EBP appeal and divergence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? School-level general climate negatively moderated the effect of strategic climate on Appeal (b = −0.59) and Divergence (b = −0.41), and the interaction significantly improved model fit (change in −2 log-likelihood = 12.50). → Zhang 2023 q3 i? In schools with moderate or low general climate, higher strategic climate showed a strong positive association with Appeal and Divergence, but in schools with high general climate the association was much weaker (nearly flat slopes). → Zhang 2023 (2)

Evidence

Zhang 2023

Zhang, Y., Cook, C., Fallon, L., Corbin, C., Ehrhart, M., Brown, E., Locke, J., & Lyon, A. (2023). The Interaction Between General and Strategic Leadership and Climate on Their Multilevel Associations with Implementer Attitudes Toward Universal Prevention Programs for Youth Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-022-01248-5

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Interaction terms entered into the level-2 equations of the climate MLMs on 441 implementers in 52 schools; the results report that "general climate negatively moderated the effect of strategic climate on Appeal (b = − 0.59) and Divergence (b = − 0.41)", with a deviance change of 12.50 indicating improved fit.

"Specifically, at the organizational level, general climate negatively moderated the effect of strategic climate on Appeal (b = − 0.59) and Divergence (b = − 0.41; Table 7)."

Zhang 2023 (2)

Zhang, Y., Cook, C., Fallon, L., Corbin, C., Ehrhart, M., Brown, E., Locke, J., & Lyon, A. (2023). The Interaction Between General and Strategic Leadership and Climate on Their Multilevel Associations with Implementer Attitudes Toward Universal Prevention Programs for Youth Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-022-01248-5

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Simple slope plots (Figs. 2, 3) with estimated marginal means depicted the interaction; in schools with "moderate or low levels of general climate, higher levels of strategic climate showed a strong positive association with higher levels of Appeal and Divergence", while the association was much weaker at high general climate.

"But in the schools with high levels of general climate, high levels of stra- tegic climate showed a much weaker positive association with Appeal and Divergence (i.e., nearly flatted slopes in Figs. 2, 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id general-climate-moderates-strategic-climate-effect
title At the organizational level, general climate negatively moderates the positive effect of strategic climate on implementers' perceptions of EBP appeal and divergence
description At the organizational level, general climate negatively moderates the positive effect of strategic climate on implementers' perceptions of EBP appeal and divergence
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
recheck_by 2028
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — zhang-2023, zhang-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.