Claims

Higher inhibition and working-memory scores predict better overall Shape School accuracy at some ages, independent of trial type

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Go/No-Go performance had significant main effects on accuracy at ages 3;9 (γ = .004, p = .023 in mixing models) and in local-cost models at 3;9 and 4;6. → Chevalier N. 2012 q3 i? Nebraska Barnyard performance had significant main effects at ages 3;9 and 4;6 in local-cost models, but not at 5;3 (p = .36). → Chevalier N. 2012 (2)

Evidence

Chevalier N. 2012

Chevalier N., Sheffield T. D., Nelson J. M., Clark C. A. C., Wiebe S. A., Espy K. A. (2012). Underpinnings of the Costs of Flexibility in Preschool Children: The Roles of Inhibition and Working Memory. Developmental Neuropsychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308575/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

In local-cost models, GNG main effects were significant at 3;9 (γ = .038, p = .008) and 4;6 (γ = .059, p = .043); children one SD above the GNG mean were "3.8% more accurate overall... and 5.9% more accurate at age 4;6."

"GNG performance had a significant main effect at ages 3;9 (γ = .038, p = .008) and 4;6 (γ = .059, p = .043). Children who scored one SD higher than average were 3.8% more accurate overall than children who scored at the GNG mean at age 3;9, and 5.9% more accurate at age 4;6."

Chevalier N. 2012 (2)

Chevalier N., Sheffield T. D., Nelson J. M., Clark C. A. C., Wiebe S. A., Espy K. A. (2012). Underpinnings of the Costs of Flexibility in Preschool Children: The Roles of Inhibition and Working Memory. Developmental Neuropsychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308575/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Nebraska Barnyard main effects were significant at 3;9 (γ = .056, p = .036) and 4;6 (γ = .040, p = .001) but not at 5;3 (γ = .016, p = .36), indicating overall accuracy benefits of working memory at the younger ages only.

"Similarly, NB performance had a significant main effect at ages 3;9 (γ = .056, p = .036), 4;6 (γ = .040, p = .001) and 5;3 (γ = .016, p = .36)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gng-nb-main-effects-overall-accuracy
title Higher inhibition and working-memory scores predict better overall Shape School accuracy at some ages, independent of trial type
description Higher inhibition and working-memory scores predict better overall Shape School accuracy at some ages, independent of trial type
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — chevalier-n-2012, chevalier-n-2012-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.