Claims

GPT-4 achieves a pooled MCQ accuracy of 81% on medical licensing examinations, significantly surpassing GPT-3.5's 58%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across 29 studies, GPT-4's integrated accuracy on medical licensing examination MCQs was 81% (95% CI 78-84), versus 58% (95% CI 53-63) for GPT-3.5 across 25 studies. → Mingxin Liu 2024

Evidence

Mingxin Liu 2024

Mingxin Liu, Tsuyoshi Okuhara, XinYi Chang, Ritsuko Shirabe, Yuriko Nishiie, Hiroko Okada, Takahiro Kiuchi. (2024). Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/60807

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 25 studies reporting GPT-3.5 accuracy and 29 reporting GPT-4 accuracy, using random-effects models owing to significant heterogeneity (GPT-3.5: I²=95% and GPT-4 I²=93%). The review reports "The integrated accuracy for GPT-3.5 was 58%" and 81% for GPT-4.

"The integrated accuracy for GPT-3.5 was 58% (95% CI 53-63; P<.01), and the integrated accuracy for GPT-4 was 81% (95% CI 78-84; P<.01"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.