Claims

GPT-4 significantly outperforms ChatGPT-3.5 in accuracy on national health licensing examinations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In subgroup analysis, GPT-4 achieved significantly higher accuracy (80.4%) than ChatGPT-3.5 (58.9%) on national licensing examinations. → Jin Hye Kyung 2024

Evidence

Jin Hye Kyung 2024

Jin Hye Kyung, Lee Ha Eun, Kim EunYoung. (2024). Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in national licensing examinations for medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05944-8

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects subgroup analysis comparing the two ChatGPT model versions across the included studies. GPT-4 pooled accuracy was "80.4% (95% CI, 78.6-82.0%)" versus 58.9% for ChatGPT-3.5; the difference was significant (Q = 177.027, p < 0.001).

"The effect size for the percentage of performance with regard to the ChatGPT models was 58.9% (95% CI, 56.2-61.6%) for ChatGPT-3.5 and 80.4% (95% CI, 78.6-82.0%) for GPT-4."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.