Claims

Graphing instruction in K-12 STEM education is beneficial for student learning, improving both graph construction and graph interpretation skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the 50 included studies, graphing instruction improved students' graph construction skills and also improved graph interpretation skills. → Verena Rufai 2024

Evidence

Verena Rufai 2024

Verena Rufai, Dominik Thüsbj, Sarah Malonecj, Stefan Küchemanndi, Sebastian Becker-Genschowe, Markus Vogelf, Roland Brünkengj, Jochen Kuhnhi. (2024). A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Graphing Numerical Data in K-12 STEM Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis of 50 peer-reviewed empirical studies on graphing in K-12 STEM education reports that "Graphing instruction seemed to be beneficial for student learning, not only improving graph construction but also graph interpretation skills." No pooled effect size is printed.

"Graphing instruction seemed to be beneficial for student learning, not only improving graph construction but also graph interpretation skills."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.