Claims

Students experience difficulties during graphing both during graph construction and during the interpretation and usage of data

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students encountered various difficulties during graphing, both during graph construction and during the interpretation and usage of data. → Verena Rufai 2024

Evidence

Verena Rufai 2024

Verena Rufai, Dominik Thüsbj, Sarah Malonecj, Stefan Küchemanndi, Sebastian Becker-Genschowe, Markus Vogelf, Roland Brünkengj, Jochen Kuhnhi. (2024). A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Graphing Numerical Data in K-12 STEM Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's synthesis of 50 peer-reviewed empirical studies reports that "the students experienced various difficulties during graphing, both during graph construction and the interpretation and usage of data." No effect size is printed for this finding.

"However, the students experienced various difficulties during graphing, both during graph construction and the interpretation and usage of data."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.