Claims

Students reported highest satisfaction with the feedback process in the CASP-based teaching format

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Overall satisfaction with the teaching format was 72.22% very satisfied and 27.78% satisfied, with the feedback process rated very satisfied by 72.22% of students. → Nawanopparatsakul 2024

Evidence

Nawanopparatsakul 2024

Nawanopparatsakul, S., Watana, S., Taesotikul, T., Phuagphong, P., & Chinpaisal, C. (2024). Development of Skills for Pharmacy Students in Evaluating Randomized Controlled Trials Using CASP Checklist. Proceedings of ICRES 2024 -- International Conference on Research in Education and Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED673088

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire on satisfaction with teaching management and skill development, reported in Table 6; "the feedback process at 72.22%" received the highest very-satisfied rating, with no students dissatisfied on overall format.

"Students expressed highest satisfaction with the overall teaching format, particularly praising the feedback process at 72.22%. This was followed by satisfaction with the instructor team, and assignment quantity at 66.67% and 61.11% respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.