First-year students taught Calculus with Microsoft Mathematics achieved higher post-test scores than students taught conventionally¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group outperformed the control group on the post test, with a mean difference of 6.09 points. → Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015 q2 i? The pre-to-post gain was larger in the experimental group (5.14) than in the control group (0.82). → Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015

Evidence¶

Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015¶

Rina Oktaviyanthi, Yani Supriani. (2015). Experimental Design: Utilizing Microsoft Mathematics in Teaching and Learning Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078520

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 22 first-year students randomly divided into an experimental group taught with Microsoft Mathematics and a control group taught conventionally. Post-test means were 79.4545 versus 73.3636; the article reports "a difference is 6.09" as a significant result, printing no effect size.

"In Table7 noted that the higher mean is earned by the experimental group with a difference is 6.09. This illustrates a significant result for the study that the experimental group had better performance than the control group in the post test."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students taught with Microsoft Mathematics reported more positive mathematics and computer confidence attitudes than control students — related
• The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on the pre test — related