Claims

The GSP condition used researcher-prepared worksheets guiding students to discover geometric concepts by dragging and transforming shapes in a computer laboratory

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The experimental intervention consisted of GSP software used with open-ended and gap-filling worksheets in a computer laboratory, with the teacher guiding via questions. → Kesan 2013

Evidence

Kesan 2013

Kesan, C. & Çalıskan, S. (2013). The effect of learning geometry topics of 7th grade in primary education with dynamic Geometer's Sketchpad geometry software to success and retention. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008875

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive account of the intervention: courses were held in the computer laboratory, students worked on researcher-prepared worksheets of open-ended and gap-filling questions, and "reached the results on their own" while the teacher guided with questions.

"The students discovered geometric concepts (line, angle, and triangle) by drawing them, moving the shapes, dragging, changing their features by GSP; and reached the results on their own."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.