Without video review, hands-on activities enhance vocational students' practical skill performance more effectively than virtual simulations¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the absence of video review, the hands-on activity group significantly outperformed the virtual simulation group on circuit fault detection performance (MD = 2.42, p < 0.001). → Zhanyong Qi 2026
Evidence¶
Zhanyong Qi 2026¶
Zhanyong Qi, Jiayi Wang, Yue Du, Xinyue Zhang. (2026). The effect of blended learning approaches on vocational school students' practical skills performance and learning behaviors: virtual simulations or hands-on activities while accessing instructional videos. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09793-4
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ANCOVA on post-test skill performance with pre-test as covariate in a randomized 2x2 experiment (130 vocational students). The pairwise contrast showed the hands-on group's "superior performance in detecting circuit faults compared to the virtual simulation group" (MD = 2.42, P < 0.001); no standardized effect size was printed for this contrast.
"Additional analysis indicated that, in the absence of video review, the hands-on activity group demonstrated superior performance in detecting circuit faults compared to the virtual simulation group (MD = 2.42, P < 0.001; see Fig. 6)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Video review enhances practical skill performance in both modalities and eliminates the hands-on versus virtual simulation difference — reports the opposite
- Video review scaffolds self-regulated learning, and hands-on activity groups show greater self-regulation than virtual simulation groups — related
- Video review produces more structured reflective behavior patterns, with modality-specific video interaction sequences — related
- Hands-on activity groups show fewer erroneous operations than correct ones, and hands-on with video review students use video more than virtual simulation peers — related
- Video review raises learning interest under virtual simulation but not under hands-on activity — related
- Physical Experience Enhances Science Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Hands-on experiments promote epistemic and value-related situational interest more than computer simulations, while emotional situational interest does not differ — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
hands-on-beats-virtual-simulation-without-video-review |
title |
Without video review, hands-on activities enhance vocational students' practical skill performance more effectively than virtual simulations |
description |
Without video review, hands-on activities enhance vocational students' practical skill performance more effectively than virtual simulations |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zhanyong-qi-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.