Hands-on booster practice produced significantly fewer life-supporting skill errors than video booster or control at follow-up¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The hands-on group made significantly fewer errors in life-supporting skills at follow-up than the combined control and video groups (72% vs 63%, P = 0.021). → Spénard Sarah 2022

Evidence¶

Spénard Sarah 2022¶

Spénard Sarah, Postlow Fabiana, Curran Vernon. (2022). E-learning use in the review of neonatal resuscitation program in physicians: a scoping review. Journal of Perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01411-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

In the randomized controlled trial (N = 44 family medicine residents) comparing hands-on, video, and control boosters given 3-5 months after NRP, all groups made lifesaving skills errors at 6-8 month follow-up, but the hands-on group made significantly fewer life-supporting errors (P = 0.021).

"the participants in the hands-on group made significantly fewer errors at follow-up compared to the combined control and video groups averaged in five scenarios (72% and 63%, respectively, P = 0.021)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills deteriorate significantly in the months following NRP certification — related
• Hands-on activity groups show fewer erroneous operations than correct ones, and hands-on with video review students use video more than virtual simulation peers — related
• Video review scaffolds self-regulated learning, and hands-on activity groups show greater self-regulation than virtual simulation groups — related
• Without video review, hands-on activities enhance vocational students' practical skill performance more effectively than virtual simulations — related