Claims

HFPS based on life-threatening clinical scenarios produces significantly larger performance gains than other teaching methods in nursing students (d=0.50)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Pooled across studies, HFPS showed significantly larger effect sizes for performance than any other teaching method (d=0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81, p=0.001). → La Cerra Carmen 2019

Evidence

La Cerra Carmen 2019

La Cerra Carmen, Dante Angelo, Caponnetto Valeria, Franconi Ilaria, Gaxhja Elona, Petrucci Cristina, Alfes Celeste M, Lancia Loreto. (2019). Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 9(2):e025306. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effect meta-analysis of objective performance outcomes measured by direct observation or objective instruments (e.g., ACLS Mega Code Performance Score Sheet). The pooled effect favoured HFPS: "d=0.50, 95% CI [0.19 to 0.81], Z-test=3.12, p=0.001".

"HFPS sessions showed significant larger effects sizes for knowledge (d=0.49, 95% CI [0.17 to 0.81], Z-test=3.06, p=0.003) and performance (d=0.50, 95% CI [0.19 to 0.81], Z-test=3.12, p=0.001) than any other teaching method"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.