High-fidelity simulation training improves knowledge acquisition among practising registered nurses (moderate pooled effect)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Meta-analysis of six studies (185 nurses) found HFS training produced a moderate, significant improvement in knowledge acquisition compared with traditional methods (SMD = 0.65), with no heterogeneity. → Zhou Jie 2026
Evidence¶
Zhou Jie 2026¶
Zhou Jie, Zhang Guowen, Song Peige, Liaw Sok Ying, Luk Tzu Tsun. (2026). Effects of High‐Fidelity Simulation Training on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction for Practising Registered Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70206
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3
Inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis of five RCTs and one quasi-experiment pooling knowledge outcomes from 185 practising registered nurses, most using self-reported author-developed instruments. The review reports "a moderate effect of HFS on knowledge acquisition" with "no notable heterogeneity". One additional study was excluded for skewness.
"The random‐effects model revealed a moderate effect of HFS on knowledge acquisition (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI, [0.35, 0.95], p < 0.01), with no notable heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.62)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- High-fidelity simulation training improves professional skills among practising registered nurses (moderate pooled effect) — related
- High-fidelity simulation training yields a large effect on learning satisfaction among practising registered nurses — related
- The effect of high-fidelity simulation on practising nurses' self-confidence is inconclusive, varying by study design — related
- The HFS evidence base for practising nurses comprises eight small studies with risk-of-bias concerns — related
- Simulation Based Education Improves Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- The review reports that high-fidelity simulation outperformed case-based discussion for clinical reasoning and leadership in paediatric emergencies — related
- In an RCT of ICU nurses, simulation-based education produced within-group gains in knowledge, confidence and competence but no between-group differences at 6 weeks — related
- High-fidelity simulation improves ECT procedural skills substantially but does not reliably improve theoretical knowledge or confidence — related
- IVR simulation significantly improves nursing students' knowledge acquisition with a small-to-medium effect — related
- High-fidelity simulation methods (simulators, 3D models, cadaver-based practice) are associated with superior Acquisition retention, though some studies report contradictory findings — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.