Teachers rated the CSC coaching as highly satisfactory (TCES total M = 89.92)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Teacher satisfaction with the CSC Model was very high on the 14-item TCES. → Dudek et al. 2019

Evidence¶

Dudek et al. 2019¶

Christopher M. Dudek, MEd, Linda A. Reddy, PhD, Adam Lekwa, PhD, Anh N. Hua, PhD, and Gregory A. Fabiano, PhD. (2019). Improving Universal Classroom Practices Through Teacher Formative Assessment and Coaching. Assessment for Effective Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418772919

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive TCES results (α = .91 in this study) from the 32 teachers; item means on the 7-point scale ranged from 5.86 to 6.96 with a total of "M = 89.92, SD = 8.06". No inferential test was reported.

"Overall, teachers rated their satisfaction with the CSC Model as very high (M = 89.92, SD = 8.06). Notably, the means for each item did not go below 5.86 (Item 10, SD = 1.43) and ranged as high as 6.96 (Item 1, SD = .19)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• CSC coaching produced no statistically significant improvement in standardized instructional strategy counts — related
• CSC coaching significantly reduced teachers' need for change in behavior management practices (BMS discrepancy scores, d = .68) — related
• CSC coaching significantly reduced teachers' need for change in instructional practices (IS discrepancy scores, d = .88) — related
• Teachers, parents, and coaches report high satisfaction and strong coach-teacher alliance with First Step Next — related
• Experts rated the OTIL Model as appropriate and satisfactory (overall mean 4.92) — related