Experts rated the OTIL Model as appropriate and satisfactory (overall mean 4.92)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Three experts in instructional systems design and English language teaching rated the OTIL Model appropriate and satisfactory, with six of eight items receiving the maximum mean of 5.00. → Xingbin Tian & Suksan Suppasetseree 2013
Evidence¶
Xingbin Tian & Suksan Suppasetseree 2013¶
Xingbin Tian & Suksan Suppasetseree. (2013). Development of an Instructional Model for Online Task-Based Interactive Listening for EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p30
q2 · i? · design · r2
Expert evaluation of the OTIL Model using a researcher-designed form with 8 five-point-scale items plus an open-ended question. Six items received the highest mean (x=5.00, SD=0.00); Items 2 and 3 received 4.67 (SD=0.577). The overall rating was "4.92 (SD=0.282)".
"Overall, the OTIL Model was rated by the experts at the mean score of 4.92 (SD=0.282) which indicates the model is appropriate and satisfactory."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers rated the CSC coaching as highly satisfactory (TCES total M = 89.92) — related
- The experimental class taught with OTIL lessons in Moodle scored significantly higher on the listening post-test than the control class — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.