Teaching staff showed high trust that LA tools allow students to make their own decisions, though the item was least desirable¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i1 Item 6 (allow students to make their own decisions) had the lowest ideal–predicted gap for LA tools, indicating high trust, but also the least ideal expectation; the paired t-test was significant with a small-to-medium effect size. → Asma Shannan Alzahrani 2023

Evidence¶

Asma Shannan Alzahrani 2023¶

Asma Shannan Alzahrani, Yi-Shan Tsai, Naif Aljohani, Emma Whitelock-wainwright, Dragan Gasevic. (2023). Do teaching staff trust stakeholders and tools in learning analytics? A mixed methods study. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10229-w

q2 · i1 · associational · r1

Survey paired t-test for LA-tool item 6 among 65 teaching staff. The article reports item 6 "had the lowest average rating of the gap between predicted and ideal expectations" yet the least ideal expectation, indicating less desirable but high trust (t = 2.301, p = 0.025, Cohen's d = 0.32).

"The paired t-test of item 6 showed a significant difference between the two types of expectations with a small to medium effect size for item 6 (t = 2.301, p = 0.025, Cohen's d = 0.32)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The largest trust gap toward LA tools concerned promoting students' academic and professional skill development — related
• The largest trust gap toward HEIs concerned updating students about their learning progress — related
• Teaching staff showed high trust in HEIs' provision of access to student progress data, with no significant ideal–predicted expectation gap — related