Claims

The largest trust gap toward HEIs concerned updating students about their learning progress

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Item 8 (update students about their learning progress) had the largest rating gap between predicted and ideal expectations, indicating the highest distrust of HEIs on this service, with a significant paired t-test and medium effect size. → Asma Shannan Alzahrani 2023

Evidence

Asma Shannan Alzahrani 2023

Asma Shannan Alzahrani, Yi-Shan Tsai, Naif Aljohani, Emma Whitelock-wainwright, Dragan Gasevic. (2023). Do teaching staff trust stakeholders and tools in learning analytics? A mixed methods study. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10229-w

q2 · i2 · associational · r1

Survey paired t-test for item 8 among 65 teaching staff. The article states item 8 "had the largest rating gap between predicted and ideal expectations", indicating the highest distrust; the test was significant (t = 3.301, p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.55).

"The paired t-test showed a significant difference between the two expectation types with a medium effect size (t = 3.301, p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.55)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.