Claims

Higher-ability students are more likely to space their study in a self-regulated online course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 Students with higher final exam grades spent more sessions per unit, controlling for pretest grade and time spent in unit. → Paulo F. Carvalho 2020

Evidence

Paulo F. Carvalho 2020

Paulo F. Carvalho, Faria Sana and Veronica X. Yan. (2020). Self-regulated spacing in a massive open online course is related to better learning. npj Science of Learning 5:2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0061-1

q2 · i0 · associational · r2

A between-participant regression on the MOOC data used final exam grade as an ability proxy; "students who performed better on the final exam were also more likely to space their study more, β = 0.06". Similar results held using pretest score.

"The results (see Supplementary Table 2) reveal that those students who performed better on the final exam were also more likely to space their study more, β = 0.06, SE = 0.02, t(787.7) = 2.82, p = 0.005."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.