Claims

Students who spaced their study more also performed better on the MOOC final exam

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Spacing is a significant positive predictor of final exam grade, controlling for total time spent in the course, retention interval, and pretest score. → Paulo F. Carvalho 2020

Evidence

Paulo F. Carvalho 2020

Paulo F. Carvalho, Faria Sana and Veronica X. Yan. (2020). Self-regulated spacing in a massive open online course is related to better learning. npj Science of Learning 5:2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0061-1

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

A second regression on the same MOOC dataset predicted final exam grade from spacing with the same covariates. The article reports "students who spaced their study more also performed better in the final exam, β = 0.13".

"A similar regression model was conducted to predict final exam grade and showed the same pattern of results: students who spaced their study more also performed better in the final exam, β = 0.13, SE = 0.05, t(727) = 2.76, p < 0.01, controlling for total time spent in the course, retention interval, and pretest score."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.