Claims

In a self-regulated MOOC, spacing study across more sessions predicts higher unit quiz performance within participants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Greater self-regulated spacing (more sessions per unit) is a significant positive predictor of unit quiz grades, controlling for pretest, study time, retention interval, student and unit random factors. → Paulo F. Carvalho 2020

Evidence

Paulo F. Carvalho 2020

Paulo F. Carvalho, Faria Sana and Veronica X. Yan. (2020). Self-regulated spacing in a massive open online course is related to better learning. npj Science of Learning 5:2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0061-1

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

Regression analysis of MOOC log data from 747 course completers, with student and unit as random factors and pretest grade and time spent in unit as covariates. Spacing was defined as the number of sessions per unit; the model showed "spacing was a significant predictor of unit quiz grades, β = 0.10".

"Results (see Supplementary Table 1) revealed that spacing was a significant predictor of unit quiz grades, β = 0.10, SE = 0.02, t(6593.84) = 6.41, p < 0.001."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.