Participants across four design teams almost unanimously judged the set of HLC design principles relevant and complete, with no principles considered redundant or missing¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The 32 respondents almost unanimously found the set of design principles relevant for their HLC and complete, with only two suggested additions and one overlap comment. → Cremers 2016

Evidence¶

Cremers 2016¶

Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2016). Utilization of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9398-5

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire evaluation of intervention content across the four cases (BNR, POHHC, CO/IC, MHA). Only two MHA suggestions for additional principles and one POHHC comment about overlap between principles were reported.

"The respondents of the four cases (32) almost unanimously found the set of design principles relevant for their HLC. They also thought that the set was complete."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A boundary crossing intervention led most interprofessional design team members to perceive a set of HLC design principles as useful for structuring knowledge and gaining an overview of HLC design — related
• Examples of features from the original research context in the guidebook helped participants understand the design principles and relate them to their own HLC — related