Examples of features from the original research context in the guidebook helped participants understand the design principles and relate them to their own HLC¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Most respondents said the Value in the Valley examples helped them better understand the principles and relate them to their own HLC; 29 of 32 had read the guidebook. → Cremers 2016

Evidence¶

Cremers 2016¶

Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2016). Utilization of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9398-5

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire and oral evaluation of the intervention's form. Almost all respondents (29 out of 32) indicated they had read the guidebook, which was valued as preparation, common prior knowledge, and a reference book when developing the HLC.

"According to most respondents, the examples of how design principles were manifested in the HLC 'Value in the Valley' helped them to get a better understanding of the design principles."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The prototyping exercise promoted exchange of ideas for HLC development and enhanced a shared image of the HLC among team members
• A boundary crossing intervention led most interprofessional design team members to perceive a set of HLC design principles as useful for structuring knowledge and gaining an overview of HLC design — related
• Participants across four design teams almost unanimously judged the set of HLC design principles relevant and complete, with no principles considered redundant or missing — related