Claims

Teaching English grammar with humorous activities produced more correct quiz answers than traditional instruction in a small classroom experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught inherent and non-inherent adjectives with humour devices scored higher on an identical end-of-lesson quiz than students taught by the traditional method (13 vs 5 correct out of 19 each). → Rufaidah Kamal Abdulmajeed & Sarab Khalil Hameed 2017

Evidence

Rufaidah Kamal Abdulmajeed & Sarab Khalil Hameed 2017

Rufaidah Kamal Abdulmajeed & Sarab Khalil Hameed. (2017). Using a Linguistic Theory of Humour in Teaching English Grammar. English Language Teaching, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p40

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Classroom experiment with 38 second-year Department of English students at the University of Baghdad, divided into control and experimental groups of 19 each; the printed table shows 13 correct and 6 incorrect in the experimental group versus 5 correct and 14 incorrect in the control group. The article reports the difference as "significantly higher" but prints no test statistic or effect size.

"The results showed that the number of students who did well in the experimental group is significantly higher than the students with correct answers in the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.