Claims

The iCare Stress Management e-Training Program significantly reduced perceived stress in the iCare condition but not the education-only condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the Kajiyama et al. RCT, the change in perceived stress was significant for the iCare Condition but not the Education/Information-Only Condition (p = .017). → Klimova Blanka 2019

Evidence

Klimova Blanka 2019

Klimova Blanka, Valis Martin, Kuca Kamil, Masopust Jiri. (2019). E-learning as valuable caregivers’ support for people with dementia – A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4641-9

q3 · i? · review · r2

Randomized controlled trial in which 150 informal caregivers were randomly divided into the iCare Condition (ICC) or the Education/Information-Only Condition (EOC), using a 3-month iCare Stress Management e-Training Program; the review reports the printed p value of .017 for the between-condition contrast.

"The main outcome was a change in perceived stress; it was significant for the ICC but not the EOC (p = .017)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.