In a three-month field test, exploration and learning-organization functionalities were the most used, while social and data-ethics functionalities were used least¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the 3-month field evaluation, "Organization of Learning", "Interests", "OER", and "Personality" were the most used functionalities, each with between 509 and 555 users, ahead of "To-do" with 480 users and "Get-Together" and "Data Sovereignty" with between 310 and 387 uses. → Karrenbauer 2023

Evidence¶

Karrenbauer 2023¶

Karrenbauer, C., Brauner, T., König, C. M., & Breitner, M. H. (2023). Design, development, and evaluation of an individual digital study assistant for higher education students. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10255-8

q2 · i? · design · r2

Observational usage-data analysis during the 3-month rollout in the local learning management systems of three German higher education institutions. Of 1,036 users, 643 allowed their data to be used for research purposes; 482 (75%) were undergraduates. The analysis "revealed that the functionalities… were the most used" with printed user counts per functionality.

"The usage data revealed that the functionalities “Organization of Learning” (R.1.1), “Interests” (R.1.4, R.1.6), “OER” (R.1.5), and “Personality” (R.1.2) were the most used in that each of these had between 509 and 555 users."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In the Maker Learning @ Home cohort, feedback loops with cohort members redefined the initiative's outputs and goals — related
• Stakeholder and literature analysis yields seven IDSA requirement groups covering functionalities, contact options, data-based individuality, testing, marketing, data protection, and usability — related